Buy Onkyo TX-8222 50 Watt Stereo ReceiverOnkyo TX-8222 50 Watt Stereo Receiver Product Description:
- Power Output - 50 Watts RMS per channel (2 channels) (8 ohm, 20 Hz-20 kHz, FTC) / Dynamic Power up to 105 watts per channel
- 6 A/V inputs
- Outputs for up to 2 pair speakers
- Digitally-tuned AM/FM with up to 40 programmable station presets
- Compatible with DS-A1 optional iPod Dock for playing your iPod through the TX-8222
Product Description
Onkyo 50 Watt Stereo Receiver TX8222
Customer Reviews
Most helpful customer reviews
21 of 23 people found the following review helpful.
By Samuel Chell
I had a 30-year-old, top-of-line Marantz that gave up the ghost altogether after the internal lights started fading. Much as I liked it, the cost of repair was considerably higher than this Onkyo (the internet lists plenty of repair places to send units like the Marantz to), and I no longer use my stereo nearly as much as I used to (I wonder how often the surround-sound, 5-speaker audiophiles actually remain seated in their sonic cocoons).Anyone with experience with audio knows that manufacturer wattage claims are variable, often essentially meaningless, even when listed as RMS, and that 50 watts is more than adequate for all but the most low-efficiency speakers (Acoustic Research, Bose). So I decided to forego the extra pound and a half and save a few bucks, because the features are practically identical with the 100 watt Onkyo. The latter has a few additional frills (brightness dimmer, effects bypass, FM character naming) along with provisions on back for a studio geek to plug in 3 addition pieces of equipment.Both Onkyos have a convenient volume knob, but I miss the other knobs and the gyroscope tuning, which was more accurate than digital tuning. Also, the Marantz had a third, mid-range tone control (useful for bringing out vocals), both a loudness and a volume control, and numerous filters that were useful for "smoothing-out" the sound of some old LP records. The handiest feature of the Marantz was two additional phone plug inputs on the front of the machine, intended for plugging in tape recorders for dubbing or musical instruments for recording and monitoring. Most of us don't place units such as this in cabinets where it's convenient or even practical to plug and unplug other equipment to the rear of the machine on a continual basis. And as is the case with most Japanese manufacturers, including Sony, the machine is not actually assembled in Japan (try Malaysia).The biggest annoyance of both this receiver and the more powerful one is an ill-conceived switch that doubles as both an input and a tape monitor switch. You must avoid even touching the switch (more difficult than it sounds) or you'll activate the monitor function and mute all devices connected to the receiver. (I even placed temporary masking tape over the switch to "quarantine" it from my fingers.) Nevertheless, the 8222 is a fine performer and a top brand (I don't recall ever seeing Onkyo producing cheap, low-end product and catering to the masses, as is frequently the case with Sony and Panasonic). But I'm hanging on to the Marantz in case I decide to get cash-careless and go all-out retro.
15 of 16 people found the following review helpful.
By Al Chartreux
I already have an Onkyo receiver as my home theater receiver and have been immensely satisfied with it. I decided to go with Onkyo again when setting up speakers above my kitchen cabinets for CD and radio listening when I am in the kitchen cooking or washing dishes, etc. The TX-8222 has proven to be a worthy purchase. The speaker wire posts are screw-on binding posts, not spring clips as in cheaper models by other manufacturers. Definitely makes it easier to connect wire to the back. The 50 watts are more than powerful enough to power a pair of Sony 3-way bookshelf speakers. FM radio reception is pretty good, and the unit remembers your station presets even if the power cord is unplugged from the outlet. My two complaints about the receiver are minor - there is no numerical volume indicator on the display when you raise or lower the volume, which would have been nice, and the volume dial on the receiver moves rather pointlessly when adjusting the volume by remote. For the price though, this model can't be beat if you're looking for a stereo receiver.
13 of 14 people found the following review helpful.
By Oliver Towne
I bought this receiver as a replacement for a 25-year-old Technics that served as a slave to an Aiwa bookshelf unit and was driving four speakers. When I put that oddball system together, it took me about ten minutes to dial in a great sound, using a combination of the Aiwa's internal EQ, the Technics "loudness" button, and some unorthodox bass and treble control settings. Basically, my speakers and ears need a deep, warm bass and a natural treble.When I substituted the Onkyo, I was quite disappointed. I quickly realized the preamp tone circuits of this unit don't cut it. Even after I bought a used ten-band equalizer to compensate, it took me a long time to get a sound close to what the ancient Technics delivered.Unless you have components and speakers that are perfectly matched to the tone of this receiver, you may find yourself shopping for an equalizer. The bass control has a center peak of 100HZ and the treble is centered on 10KHZ. These are pretty standard settings, but they're not that useful. A good old fashioned "loudness" button to punch up a deeper bottom and a crisper top would have been a welcome addition. If an early '80s Technics of similar ratings had it, why not this modern receiver?Two star deduction for tone.
Latest Price: See on Amazon.com!
More Info: See on Amazon.com!
See Customers Review: See on Amazon.com!
