Deals for Denon DL-110 High Output Moving Coil Cartridge

Denon DL-110 High Output Moving Coil CartridgeBuy Denon DL-110 High Output Moving Coil Cartridge

Denon DL-110 High Output Moving Coil Cartridge Product Description:



  • High output voltage cartridge, special elliptical solid diamond stylus
  • Lightweight armature assembley, one-point suspension system
  • Double construction cantilever
  • Tracking force of 1.5 to 2.1 grams
  • Frequency range of 20 Hz to 45 kHz

Product Description

Turntables & MC Cartridges

Customer Reviews

Most helpful customer reviews

32 of 34 people found the following review helpful.
4My First MC Cart and Luvin' it!
By Armando M. Mesa
I have been utilizing the Denon DL 110 for two years.I am not able to compare it with other brands of moving coil carts in it's class or price range (either low or high output) since this is my first leap or crossover from an MM(moving magnet) set up.I can certainly say what I DO like about this high output MC cartridge,though... It presents itself VERY favorably as a musically and sonically involving cartridge. There are other cartridges out there which cost more(defunct Shure V15VxMR comes to mind, which now commands outrageous "new old stock" prices on various bidding internet sites,but I digress) that are known to be "dull","flat", and, or, simply boring;The DL 110 is anything but.Period. Due to it's high output 1.6 mV signal and freq.range or response of 20,000 Hz -45,000 Hz, yes, it does remind me of a pricier MM cart soundwise--- but that's where any sonic similarities or mimicking audio playback characteristics end.It is a bit more refined and resolved in the high frequencies range when compared to my other less costly MM carts AND even against my expensive Shure...Bass is also notably clean but NOT too tight, restricted,thin,sloppy,muddy nor exaggerated.The middle frequency range,however, while still admirably presentable with vocals,both male and female, it could be tipped a tad more in the "upfront" sense.Still, it is not recessed nor sounds as though the cartridge is performing in that "V" shaped in-line equalizer frequency formation(bass turned up full blast,mids way down low to the "V"'s point tipped bottom,and highs pushed up to ear piercing status)---Visually, that "V" shaped frequency setting on any EQ always reminds me of a flock of birds flying south for the winter,LOL.--- I would never want to give up the Denon DL 110 and chastise it regarding the mids department.Sure, there are other cartridges out there whose performance might outshine the Denon in reference to the mids or prove that that is one of their sonic or signature strengths.For what this Denon does so exceptionally well and in it's modest price range, the mids are not really an issue at all now that I think of it! As an inner groove tracker and sibilance handler , the DL 110 shows that it can put up a decent fight with it's elliptical shaped stylus (not a perfect victorious win, but a decent one). I must first say that I have used this Denon cartridge on a Technics 1600MK2 turntable, a JVC QL Y66F, and now it is mounted onto a Denon DP 59L---I really like the way it performs with the Denon( Denon on Denon). I don't know if it's that psychological play on the consumer mind(in me) that name brands should always stick with same name brand equipment or it really is a great synergistic matching/pairing.I don't doubt the latter since I really like the way it sounds on my Denon DP 59L than it did with the Technics or JVC---still, the Denon DL 110 did take a liking to the Technics medium mass arm.However,with all three 'tables,the DL 110 displayed a sort of etchy-like sound quality,but not shrill;It did take a number of hours(not sure if it's 10 or 20 or even 40 hours) before a well balanced tonal characteristic projected from this cart("broken in")...Inner groove distortion (IGD) is that pesky audible trait caused by the stylus trying to track tightly packed groove modulations and information contained in the last few tracks of a record side---Sometimes, that can also be a characterstic combo of a worn out record or stylus, or both,incorrect anti-skate setting,misalignment of the cart,etc.It is IGD that has kept many a record listener thinking or believing in the myth that IGD is completely unavoidable and must be tolerated;That is is a permament part of the vinyl medium. Less expensive or cheaply made cartridges with their styli cannot overcome this or exhibit poor tracking abilities towards the end of a record.Also, the shape of the stylus will determine this (spherical versus elliptical versus fine line contact).The "annoyance" is made obvious by a shrill or distorted sound in which music and vocals take on a screechy or harsh-etch-like quality.A finer shaped and cut stylus (usually with a smaller footprint)such as some ellipticals and a plethora of fine-line or line contact styli can defeat this with no problem---unless, you truly have a worn out record. I have caught the DL -110 on a few occasions trying to just barely give up this fight;It doesn't.As for sibilance (the letter "s" in vocals or the "th" and harsh "z" sounds as well as cymbals sounding like brittle static), again, the Denon does require some broken in time to start to smooth this type of vinyl medium playback anomaly out...With the DL 110, there is NO sharp "sssss's" cutting across the room through your speakers once it retains it's not-so-brand-new-outta-the-box period.How does the Denon DL 110 compare to my other cartridges???My other cartridges happen to be a Shure V15VxMR ,an Audio Technica AT 440ML, and a Grado Prestige Blue...As a sidebar,Shure ceased it's production of their cart a few years ago due to "exotic materials" becoming unobtanium according to Shure's website( I will mourn my Shure when it wears out)...Against the Shure, the Denon is more inviting and musical.It has a nice ample supply of solid bass.Yet, the Shure is an absolute winner and gem of a tracker for both sibilance and inner groove distortion right out of the box through and through over the Denon DL 110!The Shure is one of the BEST groove trackers I have ever owned,thus so far, even though just a little bit somewhat lacking in the "rich bass,bright highs, and musically inviting" analog vinyl categories...The Shure also only requires anywhere from 1 g-1.25, pushing no more over 1.5 g for optimal stylus pressure tracking force;The DL 110 requires anywhere from 1.6-2.0g of tracking force for optimal performance.Cartridges that require lighter tracking forces for optimal play will save your precious record collection from quicker wear and tear.The Shure requires so little stylus pressure to be able to extract so much groove wall information versus the Denon. The Denon can hold it's own pretty well but not like the Shure.Again, the Denon ,at times, seems to want to give up the battle but always leans towards the winning side!Now, the Denon DL 110 against the AT 440ML? The Denon has better soothing and more detailed highs to my ears(NOT soft or rolled off highs like the Shure). The finer subtlety allows me to hear things that otherwise just sound BRIGHT on the AT 440ML.The mids are more pronounced on the Denon.The AT 440 ML has that "V" shaped graphic equalizer frequency setting I mentioned earlier in this review. However, the AT 440 ML has a wider soundstage field and greater channel separation. The Denon's is just admirable and firm with good central imaging. Nothing sounds smeared or confusing, though I do wish I could pinpoint certain instruments easier in the air with the Denon's soundstage dimensional field as I can with the Audio Technica. The AT 440 ML has more lush and deeper bass,not boxy(albeit,kinda colored along with the highs)...I'll just say that out of all these cartridges, my least favorite to compare with the Denon is the Grado Blue. What I did like about the Blue against the Denon is it's punchy and very solid central sonic imaging (some mistake this for sounding too mono, but I think of it as the Grado filling a void where other carts fail to do and end up having a "hollow" exaggerated stereo sound).The bass on the Grado feels more solid, also... However, the Grado (no matter what turntable or cart I used it on) could NOT handle sibilance or inner groove distortion like the Denon! Plus, on a Technics turntable, the Grado is an unshielded cart that will sonically hum as it nears towards a direct drive magnet motor. So, the Grado Blue and this wonderful Denon "Red" are worlds apart... To look at the big picture,overall, one cannot go wrong in purchasing the Denon High Moving Coil DL 110 cartridge.I have yet to personally hear from another Denon DL 110 owner to dislike or have any type of disdain for this red pearlescent beauty...Almost forgot to mention, aesthetically, the Denon looks like a cart that should sell for a lot more loot; It just looks expensive and very solid,big and blocky in that audiophile sorta way :)

12 of 12 people found the following review helpful.
5A Great Bang for the Buck! Probably the Best Cartridge in this price range
By Gerald Chia
I've just dialed in the Denon DL-110 on my Linn Sondek and it sounds great! I've tried the Audio Technica AT440MLa prior to this and while the AT sounded quite decent, the Denon sounded way better. The mids were richer and records sounded really analogue and pleasurable. The AT was good but my records sounded a little too sterile and CD-like.I've also tried the Goldring 1042 prior and believe it or not, IMHO, the Denon DL-110 also sounds better than the Goldring on my system. It sounds more natural and the music breathes more. Hard to believe cos the Goldrings are extremelt pricey!For the price, the DL-110 is definitely THE bargain in the vinyl world and I recommend it with 5 stars!

10 of 10 people found the following review helpful.
4Excellent Cartridge For The Money
By S. J. Graci III
I have this cartridge set up on a Denon DP-47f turntable. I have also used the Denon DL-80 and Grado Blue cartridges. This cartridge offers more detail, openness, and imaging than those other cartridges. Its square lines make it easy to initially set up and the included overhang gauge is a bonus. It is a fairly light cartridge and additional weight is also included should you need it with your tonearm. I have the tracking force set to the cartridge's recommended high side of 1.9-2 grams with great results. It is an excellent tracker even on some discs that are badly warped. This is a great cartridge if you are new to Moving Coils because it is a High Output MC and allows you to hook it to a pre-amp's Moving Magnet input (if you are lucky enough to even have that offering on some of today's receivers). It's well worth the money if you don't want to spend a fortune on higher priced MCs and fuss with prerequisite phono pre-amps while still gaining many of MC's sound attributes. Also, at this price I don't hesitate to play used vinyl with it. This cartridge's little diamond really gets down in the groove and bypasses much of the surface noise. Although, I do tend to pair visibly and sonically bad records with the beefier Grado just so I don't damage the Denon and in turn damage the clean vinyl. If you enjoy sitting down and seriously listening to the sound of music on vinyl you will really enjoy the offerings of the DL-110 at a great price. Many cartridges that are well over twice its price are not as good.

See all 18 customer reviews...


Latest Price: See on Amazon.com!
More Info: See on Amazon.com!
See Customers Review: See on Amazon.com!

Buy Denon DL-110 High Output Moving Coil Cartridge

Buy Denon AVR-687 7.1-Channel Home Theater Receiver

Denon AVR-687 7.1-Channel Home Theater ReceiverBuy Denon AVR-687 7.1-Channel Home Theater Receiver

Denon AVR-687 7.1-Channel Home Theater Receiver Product Description:



  • 7.1-channel home theater receiver with 525 watts of total power; meaxures 17.1 x 5.8 x 16.1 inches (WxHxD)
  • 75 watts at 8 ohms across seven amplifier channels
  • Auto Setup feature precisely balances speaker levels and fine-tunes the delay settings (microphone included)
  • XM Radio ready and XM-HD surround sound capable; control iPod via optional dock
  • Surround modes: DTS 96/24 decoding for DVD video; DTS-ES 6.1 and Matrix 6.1; DTS NEO:6; Dolby Digital EX; Dolby Pro Logic IIx; Neural Surround

Product Description

Denon AVR687 Home Theater Receiver

Customer Reviews

Most helpful customer reviews

32 of 33 people found the following review helpful.
3Great Receiver...Terrible Manual/Remote
By Melissa A. Milam
Let me preface by saying the sound and capabilities of this receiver are best of the bunch for this price point. Not only are there multiple inputs and outputs for every video source, but excellent quality conversions as well. The sound definition and reproduction is fabulous as well. Read the tech specs and brag sheets from Denon for all the info...it's all true.The main criticism I have is the Owner's Manual and System Setup. I am a tech geek. I love this stuff. But I have never found a manual so poorly written or organized. Instructions on setup are incomplete. Directions concerning how to access certain menus don't work if one switch on the remote is in the wrong position (this switch is never referenced in the directions, by the way...happy hunting). Seemingly simple actions, such as selecting Zone 2 speakers On, are convuluted. There is a Zone 2 button on the front of the actual unit. Seems easy, yes? Just press it. But pressing it does nothing unless you navigate (without much help from the manual) to section 2 of System Setup and scroll to the Preamp section. From there, choose between Zone 2, Surround, Speaker Set A or B. Apparently the Zone 2 Preamp (a separate preamp from the main) also powers a second set of surround speakers used in a 7.1 configuration OR a set of Zone 2 speakers for use in a secondary location. That's great...that's fine. But why would you put a Zone 2 button on the face of the unit AND a Preamp setup in the 4th level of a System Setup Menu? It's redundant. Worse yet, the button on the face of the unit doesn't even work properly if the System Setup Menu isn't configured properly. Clearly, if I want that set of speakers to be used as Zone 2, shouldn't I just press "Zone 2." If I want them as Surround, couldn't I just press it again to de-select? Why not make the button on the face "Zone 2/Surround" and be done with it?This is just one example of an overly complicated receiver. Here's another seemingly simple item. The volume control increases in increments of 0.5 db per volume touch on the remote. This is pratically imperceptible and with a range of -80db to 16db, you can quickly get frustrated hammering away at your remote like a video game controller. Alternatively, if you press and hold the volume button on a remote, the volume increases too fast and overshoots. Why not make this control interval adjustable? If you're going to preset a volume control at 0.5 db per touch (which is ridiculous), why not allow the user to customize the interval?Bottom line: The hardware and performance of this unit is great. But the engineers that designed it are not. And the individuals who wrote the owner's manual and designed the remote must have been playing a practical joke. Did they not product test these items? For ease of use alone, I would seriously consider an Onkyo or Harmon Kardon before buying this unit.

24 of 24 people found the following review helpful.
5A great entry level Denon!
By T. Fletcher
Denon always has great sound, so I'm not going to waste time talking about that. I'm going to try to concentrate on some very minor things that I lost when upgrading from my JVC. So if you don't like nitpicking, then hurry out and buy this unit! If interested, read on to see if these little things matter to you, too.New features that I love, and why I upgraded:3 Component video inputs. This was actually hard to find, as many new receivers have only 2, or have HDMI instead.Multi-source, multi-zone. I've always had yard speakers but never multi-source.Video up-conversion. That means that I can just leave the TV on component video all the time without pushing tons of buttons to control the TV's input source. Much easier to plug a camcorder on rare occasions.Independent Video/Audio select. This wasn't really rant/raved about in the specs, but I think it is very cool because you can listen to some audio while having say, a news scroll going in the background on video. Also, it turns out it is incredibly important for me, since I don't have enough video inputs (see below) for my VCR and media center together, so I have to do some fancy wiring to capture old footage from camcorders and VCR's into MPEG2.Now, here are my gripes:First, I've always had JVC receivers, but they stopped making receivers with enough inputs for me. So I had to switch brands. I've always loved JVC for what I think is a good mix of advanced features but user friendly enough for the wife or visitors. Well, this new Denon bad boy is tough for even me to navigate until I get used to it, and I haven't even tried to demo how to use it to my wife yet. I understand they are less expensive, but I don't like switches on the remote. Rather I prefer the device selection by button, with some indicator (glowing or LCD display) to show what is currently selected. Also, it is still difficult to figure out when the buttons on the back are active or not for each source. This will take some getting used to but I haven't figured out the pattern yet. Oh yeah, speaking of the back, it is very difficult to open unless I've got a long thumbnail!Another small gripe is the "dB" volume indication, rather than all positively offset from zero. I've had other components like this before, but it is still weird. Also regarding the volume, it steps very small with a single press, but then advanced too quickly when held down. Last gripe on volume: With my JVC, it remembered the last volume level for each source when you switch back to it. This is VERY handy since not all sources have the same input level. So with the Denon, sometimes you switch sources and get blasted with sound.One more thing that many people won't care about, but I certainly do. Normally when you plug headphones into a receiver (or most devices), the speakers are muted. With my JVC, you could leave the headphone jack plugged in all the time and you just switch the speakers on/off, while having headphones + speakers active. This was great because I have a wireless base station that can be picked up upstairs by my wireless speaker in the shower, or I like to listen on wireless headphones when everyone is asleep. I don't have to plug/unplug headphone jacks all the time. Well, as I expected, this is a rare, unheralded feature that I lost when upgrading to this Denon.I also wish there were just one more rear video input source. I have DVD, Cable, and a Meda Center PC connected, which doesn't leave an opening for my old S-Video VCR, which I occasionally need. Now if I need it, I have to do a little rewiring, and then wire it back. And why isn't there an S-video input in the front for video, rather than just composite? It is cool this upconverts to component at the output, but I'll still lose a little quality when hooking up my camcorder.Don't get me wrong, this is a great unit, and I was very pleased to find a Denon that met nearly all my needs without breaking my bank.

2 of 3 people found the following review helpful.
2Denon AVR-687
By A. Logan
Don't buy it! Powere shut off and power indicator blinks red. The troubleshooter says overheat (I placed a fan over vents) or bad speaker connections at back of unit. I checked, and tried different connections over and over again.

See all 7 customer reviews...


Latest Price: See on Amazon.com!
More Info: See on Amazon.com!
See Customers Review: See on Amazon.com!

Buy Denon AVR-687 7.1-Channel Home Theater Receiver

Price Comparisons Canon EF 50mm f/1.2 L USM Lens for Canon Digital SLR Cameras

Canon EF 50mm f/1.2 L USM Lens for Canon Digital SLR CamerasBuy Canon EF 50mm f/1.2 L USM Lens for Canon Digital SLR Cameras

Canon EF 50mm f/1.2 L USM Lens for Canon Digital SLR Cameras Product Description:



  • High-performance, weather-resistant standard lens
  • AF with full-time manual focus
  • 50mm focal length
  • f1.2 Maximum aperture; 72mm filter size
  • UltraSonic Motor (USM)
  • The focal length is 50mm

Product Description

What’s in the box: Canon Normal EF 50mm f/1.2L USM Autofocus Lens, E-72U 72mm Snap-On Lens Cap, Lens Dust Cap E (Rear), ES-78 Lens Hood, Lens Case LP1214, 1-Year Warranty

Customer Reviews

Most helpful customer reviews

512 of 539 people found the following review helpful.
5Don't believe the reviews!
By Mark J. Sebastian
The reviews of the 50mm f/1.2L are useless. All you hear is "Spend your money on the 35L or 85L instead" or "the focusing issues make this lens unuseable". But something makes me think that people are just writing reviews based on what other people have said without actually ever using the product.If you ever want to shoot snapshots of downtown without a flash at midnight WHILE walking, this is the lens to have. I'm so in love with this lens.Pros:* It's completely silent. Quieter than the f/1.4* It has no problems focusing in the dark* It's highly useable at f1.2* It's sharper than the f/1.4* Colors are more saturated than the f/1.4* Images taken with this lens have higher contrast than the f/1.4* It makes the f/1.4 feel like a hunk of plastic* It comes with a hoodCons:* It costs 4 times more than the f/1.4* It costs 18 times more than the f/1.8Pros:* You can comfortably shoot under conditions that would make the f/1.4 nervous.* Produces a much higher yield of useable photos* Aesthetically, it's the coolest looking lens I own!For those who are concerned about the "back focusing" issue, I will let you know that I haven't experienced any backfocusing at all. I've let others shoot with it, wide open, within low-light environments and even the non-photographers were able to focus/shoot accurately.This is my review from my non-scientific, real-world, situational testing.

151 of 159 people found the following review helpful.
5Don't be scared. It is good lens.
By Dong W. Kim
I am not a professional photographer, or make living with taking pictures. I am just a person who loves to take pictures & enjoys good pictures. And, I know how expensive this lens is, and YES, I am very aware of "Back Focusing" issue with this lens that others worry. I have been using this lens for 3 weeks now, and have been experiencing good & bad about this lens. (I believe "back focusing" issue was way too much inflated.) I have EOS 5D, and wanted to take full advantage of FF factor, and this was why I took a plunge instead of getting acclaimed 35MM or 85MM.Good:Picture quality - from f1.2 thru f2.8, the lens works superbly. AF is fast & faster compared to 50mm 1.4. Above f2.8, the pictures become a touch soft, but it exceeded my expectation. In low light condition, this lens is virtually unbeatable.Weight & Feel - Anoth factor that sold me to this lens is its overall feel. Very balanced & well weighted. And, its build quality is good.Bad:Back Focus - Yes, it does back focus in very (very) close distance. Within 20 inches, you may experience back focusing more than half of the time. (Others say within 30 inches or so, but I never experienced more than 20 inches far.) I asked myself how many times (in reality), I would try taking pictures within such distance.Cost - Yes, this is expensive lens. 4 times more than very good 50mm 1.4.I love to take portraits (especially for my new born baby) , and this was my main reason that I upgraded from 50mm 1.4 to 50mm 1.2. I would recommend this lens if you are into portraits. If you want more than what I am into, you may be disappointed. Did I make a good investment? Yes, I believe I did.

294 of 319 people found the following review helpful.
5Reformed user
By MS
I have to briefly comment regarding this lens. In the past I had been lukewarm about it, but over time I have come to cherish it. Make no mistake, it has caused me some troubles over the years. As others have written, there is a learning curve to the lens. The narrow aperture at f1.2 itself requires some practice but even beyond this, the lens has some quirks that, like a good friend, you learn to understand better and eventually start to like. I also have to say that when I started fussing with this lens some years ago I was using the 5D --which I still love-- but having upgraded to various other bodies such as the 5D II and others, the focusing reliability of this lens has improved dramatically. I have since sold off most of my L lenses and now exclusively shoot with the 50L and I can't see parting with it anytime soon.

See all 124 customer reviews...


Latest Price: See on Amazon.com!
More Info: See on Amazon.com!
See Customers Review: See on Amazon.com!

Buy Canon EF 50mm f/1.2 L USM Lens for Canon Digital SLR Cameras

Discounted CDI Torque 2401CI3 Drive Computorq 3 Electronic Torque Wrench, 1/4-Inch

CDI Torque 2401CI3 Drive Computorq 3 Electronic Torque Wrench, 1/4-InchBuy CDI Torque 2401CI3 Drive Computorq 3 Electronic Torque Wrench, 1/4-Inch

CDI Torque 2401CI3 Drive Computorq 3 Electronic Torque Wrench, 1/4-Inch Product Description:



  • Standard model
  • 2 to 20 foot pounds
  • Displays real time torque values in any of four torque units
  • 15 degree flex ratcheting head
  • Ergonomically designed molded non slip rubber grip

Product Description

Item Description

  • Digital readout torque wrench that displays real time torque values in any of four units (ft. lbs, in. lbs, Nm, kg.cm.)
  • Large easy to read digital display
  • 15 degree flex ratcheting push button socket release head that torques in both clockwise and counter-clockwise directions
  • Audible tone sounds when set torque value is reached, if the set torque value is exceeded, an alarm tone will sound
  • 3 color LED light bar: yellow indicates approaching desired torque setting, green indicates desired torque value is reached, red indicates fastener was overtorqued
  • Accuracy: +/-2% CW of readings from 20% to 100% of full scale +/3% CCW of readings from 20% to 100% of full scale
  • N.I.S.T. traceable Certificate of Calibration included
  • Two CR123 Lithium batteries included
  • CDI Torque Products, a Snap-on Company

Item Specifications

  • drive: 1/4"
  • range (Nm): 2.71-27.10
  • range (in. lbs.): 24-240
  • :

Customer Reviews

Most helpful customer reviews

2 of 3 people found the following review helpful.
51/4 Inch Torque Wrench - Best By Far
By So-Far
This is a very high end top quality produce. It has features that makes it and excellent choice. The LED lights that come on as you approach, obtain, and go over the correct torque allows the application of the correct amount of torque the first try. A great addition to any tool chest.

0 of 0 people found the following review helpful.
4CDI 1/4 Inch Torque Wrench
By WCarp
I found that the wrench tends to indicate I've reached the torque setting before I actually do. I sent it back to the manufacturer and they made an adjustment but it didn't seem to significantly help. I was told basically, that it works this way to help prevent over-torquing by people who really "wrench" on things. The battery fits rather tight in the battery compartment.Other than these things, the wrench seems to be fine.

1 of 2 people found the following review helpful.
5one nice tool
By cars4billy
This tool is a very easy tool to use and i find it a must have in my tool box. i've made so many people look twice at me over this new tool,my reputation has came up 10 fold. I'm just a out of work dad doing mechanic work on the side to help make ends meet and i find this tool a great buy from Amazon.com .

See all 3 customer reviews...


Latest Price: See on Amazon.com!
More Info: See on Amazon.com!
See Customers Review: See on Amazon.com!

Buy CDI Torque 2401CI3 Drive Computorq 3 Electronic Torque Wrench, 1/4-Inch

Compare Prices for CDI Torque 6002LDIN 3/8-Inch Drive Memory Needle Dual Scale Torque Wrench, Torque Range 0 to 600-Inc

CDI Torque 6002LDIN 3/8-Inch Drive Memory Needle Dual Scale Torque Wrench, Torque Range 0 to 600-IncBuy CDI Torque 6002LDIN 3/8-Inch Drive Memory Needle Dual Scale Torque Wrench, Torque Range 0 to 600-Inc

CDI Torque 6002LDIN 3/8-Inch Drive Memory Needle Dual Scale Torque Wrench, Torque Range 0 to 600-Inc Product Description:



  • Torque range is 0 to 600-Inch pounds
  • Memory needle
  • Designed for the automotive, nuclear, and industrial markets in addition to military installations throughout the world
  • Features a sturdy torsion beam design for dependable long life and accuracy
  • Easy to read laser marked single scale

Product Description

FEATURES

Sturdy body construction insures durability

Easy to Read Laser Marked Dual Scale

Large easy to read dial is shock resistant and protected by a tough metal guard

Memory needle retains highest torque reading applied

Calibrated in both CW and CCW direction

Accuracy: ± 4% of indicated value, CW & CCW, from 20% to 100% of full scale
Individually serialized with matching certificate of calibration traceable to N.I.S.T.

The CLASSIC Series continues to offer a body design that provides durability and performance. Torque capacities range from 15 in. lbs. to 2,000 ft. lbs., in 1/4", 3/8", 1/2", 3/4" and 1" drives.

Customer Reviews

Most helpful customer reviews

0 of 0 people found the following review helpful.
5Sweet!
By Wolfgang Unger
I do a lot of commercial electrical work and more jurisdictions are requiring meter cans, panels, and disconnects to have their lugs tightened to manufacture's specs. The old "feels about right" method is going away quickly! This wrench is outstanding and simple to use; and in the in-lbs that most electrical specs use! Makes quick work of spec torquing. I would never go back to a non-dial type wrench! All my fellow electricians are sold on first use!

See all 1 customer reviews...


Latest Price: See on Amazon.com!
More Info: See on Amazon.com!
See Customers Review: See on Amazon.com!

Buy CDI Torque 6002LDIN 3/8-Inch Drive Memory Needle Dual Scale Torque Wrench, Torque Range 0 to 600-Inc

Cheap Denon AVR-587 7.1-Channel Home Theater Receiver

Denon AVR-587 7.1-Channel Home Theater ReceiverBuy Denon AVR-587 7.1-Channel Home Theater Receiver

Denon AVR-587 7.1-Channel Home Theater Receiver Product Description:



  • 7.1-channel home theater receiver with 525 watts of total power; meaxures 17.1 x 5.8 x 16.1 inches (WxHxD)
  • 75 watts at 8 ohms across seven amplifier channels
  • XM Radio ready and XM-HD surround sound capable; control iPod via optional dock
  • 56-station AM/FM/XM random preset memory tuning
  • Surround modes: DTS 96/24 decoding for DVD video; DTS-ES 6.1 and Matrix 6.1; DTS NEO:6; Dolby Digital EX; Dolby Pro Logic IIx; Neural Surround

Product Description

Denon AVR587 Home Theater Receiver

Customer Reviews

Most helpful customer reviews

0 of 0 people found the following review helpful.
5SJP
By sjp-butch
I paid $299.99 at defunct CircuitCity. Replace it with Onkyo 616 and returned it because Denon sounded better les THX.Denon AVR-587 7.1-Channel Home Theater Receiver

4 of 10 people found the following review helpful.
4Enough for a Home Theater
By Hector Perez
Excellent product for that price; not that easy to calibrate because the instruction manual is kind of confusing. Set the second zone is also not an easy task.I have it installed with the screen in my first floor and enjoy it a lot more than the Bose lifestyle 38 set in my game room upstairs; with the JBL speakers (in ceiling) inside and the outdoor Yamaha speakers in my backyard, I expend one third of the money I paid for the Bose system. The quality of the sound and possibilities of changes in the sound is a lot better with separate amplifier as this Denon.

See all 2 customer reviews...


Latest Price: See on Amazon.com!
More Info: See on Amazon.com!
See Customers Review: See on Amazon.com!

Buy Denon AVR-587 7.1-Channel Home Theater Receiver

Deals for Canon EF 70-200mm f/4 L IS USM Lens for Canon Digital SLR Cameras

Canon EF 70-200mm f/4 L IS USM Lens for Canon Digital SLR CamerasBuy Canon EF 70-200mm f/4 L IS USM Lens for Canon Digital SLR Cameras

Canon EF 70-200mm f/4 L IS USM Lens for Canon Digital SLR Cameras Product Description:



  • 70-200mm telephoto zoom lens with f/4 maximum aperture for Canon digital SLR cameras
  • Fluorite UD lens elements produce excellent optical performance in resolution and contrast
  • Ring-type ultra-sonic monitor (USM) for quick and quiet autofocusing; lightweight construction
  • Image Stabilizer provides up to 4 stops of shake correction; water- and dust-proof construction
  • Measures 3 inches in diameter and 6.8 inches long; weighs 26.8 ounces; 1-year warranty

Product Description

Canon's EF 70-200mm f/4L IS USM is a lightweight, compact L Series telephoto zoom lens with Image Stabilizer. The optical Image Stabilization in the new EF 70-200mm f/4L IS USM lens provides up to an incredible four stops of shake correction-a first for Canon IS lenses. The use of fluorite UD lens elements provides excellent optical performance in terms of resolution and contrast. These features, together with its water-and dust-proof construction, provide both the performance and portability to meet user demands.What’s in the box: Canon EF 70-200mm f/4L IS USM Lens, E-67U 67mm Snap-On Lens Cap, Lens Dust Cap E (Rear), ET-74 Lens Hood, LP1224 Lens Case and 1-Year Warranty.

Customer Reviews

Most helpful customer reviews

799 of 807 people found the following review helpful.
5Image quality king of the 70-200mm line.
By Jesse R. Hunter
I have owned at one point or another all Canon's 70-200mm's with exception of the f/2.8 non-IS, along with a decent amount of other Canon L glass. Hence this review will be from the perspective of someone who may be deciding whether or not to add this piece of glass to their matured L collection or someone who is deciding on this lens versus another 70-200mm. If you are instead someone who has already decided on this lens and is looking for one last push to click the buy button, consider this, and the 25 reviews below it, as your green light.First up, let's talk about the obvious good. This lens carries with it the most advanced IS drive to date, yielding an incredible 4-stops of stabilization. In real life, it is infact four full stops of stabilization. No kidding. For non-moving subjects, this lens becomes an effective 70-200mm f/1.4 as far as handholdability is concerned. When there is subject movement, however, realize that f/4 is still your true aperture and motion blur will be inherent.As for the not-so-obvious good, this 70-200mm version has the highest image quality out of any of the other 70-200mm's. CA, vignetting, and sharpness is the best with this lens. Lens weight and balance is also the best in comparison to what it offers: it's only slightly heavier than the f/4 with all that IS goodness and not even close to as heavy as the f/2.8 IS with it's one-stop advantage.The Bad. I always try to find something I dislike with each lens. For some L lenses, it gets tough and I have to get picky, such as with the 135mm f/2L or the 180mm F/3.5L. This lens sits in that catagory. I would have to say I dislike the non-petal shaped lens hood. Yep. That's about it. Wish I could say more here. For the price, this really is a superior buy.Let's do some comparing.Against the 70-200mm f/4L: The 'baby' of the 70-200mm line, it's half the price. So is the IS drive worth the ~500 bucks? Well to answer that question, you must realize the limitation of f/4. F/4 usually means sharp glass that's lightweight and cheap, of good value. But it also means more than enough light for sunny days, but never enough for cloudy days, indoors, just after dusk, just before sunrise, during inclement whether, or any other time when shooting conditions are optimal for great pictures. So do you plan on using this lens without a tripod (or flash) ever during these times? If you answer yes (even if you didn't, you will), you might become frustrated with the f/4 non-IS version over time and seek to upgrade, or continuously pack a tripod for which you will also need to buy the lens tripod ring. (Do realize however, that neither the f/4 non-IS or the f/4 IS will serve you well when it comes to indoor action. For that, you'll have to move up the chain to the f/2.8.) From my personal experience, the f/4 IS also delivers an increased dynamic range near the highlights, slightly more saturation, and slightly less CA in comparison to the f/4 non-IS.The f/2.8L non-IS: I have never owned this lens, so I can only speak by stats and offer a little limited advice. They are both nearly equal in price, so let's talk about the differences. The f/2.8 is built better (more metal and sealing) and comes with a tripod ring (plus that envious petal-shaped hood). It shares the weather sealed mount and near-equal image quality (the f/4 IS is slight sharper). And you of course gain a stop in aperture but lose IS. So which is better? Since stat-wise they are so close, I would ask what your intentions are. Are you primarily a landscape photographer or an event photographer? More pictures of your kids or more of slow-moving objects. Both lenses do low-light well, it's just that if your shots have little moving in them, you are much better off with the f/4 and to use a flash when the shots do include movement. If your shots almost always include a lot of movement, go with the f/2.8 (but you should really consider the f/2.8 IS).The f/2.8 IS. The moving versus non-moving distinction is so important that I actually ended up owning BOTH the f/2.8 IS and the f/4 IS. Why? Because the f/2.8 IS is the strongest contender for low-light event work out of the 70-200 line, yet offers the worst in image quality. The image quality difference between the f/4 and the f/2.8 is nothing short of significant. You simply do not use the f/2.8 to generate fine art as it's image quality does not allow it (in my spoiled rotten opinion. In fact, until the f/4 IS came along, I didn't think any of the 70-200's were suitable for this task.) So I utilize the f/2.8 for event work and the f/4 for everything else I need a 70-200mm zoom for. As a side note, the f/2.8 maintains a 3 stop IS drive while the f/4 maintains a 4 stop drive. This means both lenses maintain the same effective 70-200mm f/1.4 aperture. Add all this up, and my recommendation is to go with the 70-200mm f/4 IS and save ~$550 unless you are a professional wedding, model, or event photographer, or if you consistently shoot family or moving objects in low light.Another comparison: the 135mm f/2L. Roughly the same price, this lens maintains an ultra fast aperture with superior image quality at a loss of versatility. The 70-200mm f/4 IS behaves better with the 1.4x extender. These two lenses tie a lot when it comes to choosing a lens to pack. Basically, if I know exactly the type of shooting environment I'll be walking into (that maintains room for sneaker zooming) and recognize the need for superior bokeh, maximum image quality, or fast shutter speeds, then the 135 it is. Otherwise, I'll pack the 70-200 f/4 IS. If you are deciding between this lens and the 135 for purchase, choose the 135 if your main intention is for portraiture, still life, or low-light arena photography (football, moster trucks, tennis, etc).The 70-200mm F/4 IS is basically your go-to lens for day hikes, airshows (with 1.4x extender, or unless you own a 300mm f/4 or better), fireworks, any landscaping in low (and therefore good) light, and anything else in which your camera will act as if it's been secured to a tripod while you take a 4-stop stabilized shot.Due to it's heavy usage as a landscape lens, I have attached a B+W polarizer (67mm filter size) and just left it on. I advise using only the best filters for this lens, don't ruin its image quality with some el cheapo filter.Other:-The exterior casing from the zoom ring back to the mount is actually hard plastic. It still feels nice and reduces the weight. The rest of the lens exterior is the typical L-grade metal.-The lens does not come with a nice case. A Lowepro 4s case is recommended.-The IS drive is one of the quietest I've heard yet. Almost silent.Conclusion: An absolute great value as far as L glass goes. A joy to use for photographers new to IS and an attraction for professionals dissapointed with the image quality and weight of the 70-200mm F/2.8 IS, whom may be looking to round out their event photography with landscape work. If you are completely unsure of what you might run into in the field and need the most general setup you can achieve, packing this lens with the 24-70mm or the 24-105mm is all you need.

353 of 358 people found the following review helpful.
5Worth every pennies
By NutMac
With over 100 lenses produced for Canon EOS system, finding the right lenses can overwhelm even the experienced photographers. My search for walkaround lens took over two months of research and auditioning. After choosing Canon's EF 17-40mm f/4L USM as a walkaround lens and EF 50mm f/1.4 USM as a portrait lens, my attention shifted toward telephoto. A bit of background info. My current DSLR body is Digital Rebel XTi (EOS 400D). I plan on upgrading to full frame DSLR body next, so I only look at EF lenses (no EF-S) with solid build quality (it needs to be around to serve the next camera).At first, finding a telephoto lens seemed almost as easy as portrait lens. Professional reviewers alike hail EF 70-200mm f/4L USM for top-notch build quality and superb optical performance at a reasonable price. (EF 70-200mm f/2.8L USM and EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS USM are too heavy, large, and expensive for my needs.) 70-200mm focal range is just about ideal for me, which becomes 112-320mm in 35mm print format. I took many fantastic pictures with it, but quickly found a problem. Without a tripod, telephoto isn't easy to shoot. With 17-40mm lens, I can take well-focused images shot after shot. Even under challenging light, I can hit fairly high percentage of photos without flash. At 200mm, situations get considerably trickier. Under very good lighting, I can take one great looking photo after another. Under somewhat limited light, however, I found myself with rather high percentage of out-of-focus photos. Increasing the ISO speed helped a good deal, but even that has a limit. Eventually, I found myself depending on the tripod for reliable results.Then I saw EF 70-200mm f/4L IS USM. At nearly twice the price tag, I was very reluctant at first. Then I was given the opportunity to play with it in person. To my surprise, it weighs and sized about the same as non-IS counterpart. And it has super-state-of-the-art 4-stop (!) image stabilizer with panning mode and tripod detection. After selling EF 70-200mm f/4L USM at a minimal loss (L-series lenses tend to have very high resale value), I saved up for IS.Weighing in at 1.68 lbs., it is only slightly heavier than non-IS and about half as heavy as f/2.8 counterparts. At 3" width and 6.8" length, it is also considerably smaller than f/2.8. Even on comparatively small Digital Rebel XTi, it does not feel entirely out of place. Thanks to inner focus, the lens does not extend nor rotate during focusing or zooming. It stays at 6.8" at all time. As to be expected, its ring-type USM with full-time manual override is silky smooth and fast. Simply a pleasure to use.The lens has 4 switches, (1) focus limiter (sets minimum focus distance of 1.2m or 3m... a bit far in my opinion, but then again, this is a telephoto lens), (2) auto/manual focus, (3) image stabilizer, and (4) stabilizer mode (regular mode 1 or panning mode 2). The image stabilizer is simply fantastic. As with other image stabilizer, it is not effective at stopping subject in motion. Once IS is switched on, it kicks in with a satisfying click when you press the shutter button half way. Click all the way and you may be able to say goodbye (at least see you later) to tripod.So how does it perform? The sharpness is simply amazing, almost as sharp as my benchmark EF 50mm f/1.4 USM lens from center-to-edge. All in all, images were even better than non-IS counterpart, with smooth and more vibrant color, no noticeble barrel distortion, vignetting, nor chroma aberrations.Also noteworthy is new circular aperture blades (8 of them), creating prettiest blur effects (bokeh) you will ever see. Thanks to Super Spectra coatings, it is even better at suppressing flare than non-IS and f/2.8 counterparts. Simply put, this is one of the most state-of-the-art zoom lenses Canon has produced.As with other L-series lenses, it comes with a carrying pouch and a lens hood. It accepts 67mm filters.Pros:- 4-stop image stabilizer.- Not too heavy. Not too large.- Amazing build quality.- Great image quality with very nice bokeh.- Top-notch focus mechanism.Cons:- Expensive.- IS will use more battery.- f/4 aperture may not be fast enough for some.

112 of 114 people found the following review helpful.
5Expensive but worth the money
By PJ
Like used Honda's and Acura's, this Canon lens is destined to command a high resale dollar.I traded in my Canon EF 70-200mm f/4L USM lens for this new lens. The colour of this lens is a slightly darker off-white (almost gray-white) than the non-IS version. So, if you have an older Canon Tripod Mount Ring A (W), you may see a slight colour mismatch. Personally, not a big deal by any means. The instruction manual illustrates and refers to their new Canon Ring-Type Tripod Mounting Socket A II (W) which I have not seen in colour to see if it is an exact colour match for this lens.Mated to my tripod mounted Canon Digital Rebel XT set at ISO 100, the lens appeared sharper than the non IS version from f/4 through to f/18 for the majority of it's focal length. For this particular lens, optimum images were obtained at f/7.1 at 70mm and f/9 at the other focal lengths.Flare is better controlled than the non IS version.Bokeh has improved with the new round eight aperture leaves.Colour and contrast have dramatically improved with the new UD glass.With the Image Stabilization (IS) activated on Mode 1, there were more useable images taken at 4 stops below the usual minimum recommended settings at all focal lengths.According to Canon Canada, the IS DOES NOT automatically shut off like Canon's EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS USM, EF 28-300mm f/3.5-5.6L IS USM, Super Telephoto and Diffractive Optic lenses. But, the battery will continue to drain while the IS is on as per the instruction manual.Because I could not find any third party substitutes, I recommend purchasing their expensive Canon tripod collars in either white or black. It optimally structurally stabilizes the lens/camera assembly. For weight reduction, you can always remove the collar.This lens and the Canon EF 17-40mm f/4 L USM lens mounted on my Canon 5D is all I need to capture almost all of my images.A word of caution: check each lens for foreign particles between the front and adjacent lens elements. I saw one lens with a large piece of something stuck onto the element immediately behind the front element.UPDATE (13-July-2007): Please see my sample photos with this lens taken af F4.0 with the IS activated. This zoom lens is even better than my trusty old Nikkor AF-D 80-200 F2.8 IF-ED!

See all 216 customer reviews...


Latest Price: See on Amazon.com!
More Info: See on Amazon.com!
See Customers Review: See on Amazon.com!

Buy Canon EF 70-200mm f/4 L IS USM Lens for Canon Digital SLR Cameras